North
Dakota Long Term Care Association Issue Briefs 2003
Study
of North Dakota’s Medicaid Nursing Facility Payment System
Purpose
& Background of Nursing Facility Payment System Study
The
North Dakota
57th Legislative Assembly passed House Bill No. 1196 in 2001.
Section 29 of this bill authorized a study of the nursing facility
payment system and the state’s equalized rate policy.
The study was to include an evaluation of the existing system and
any recommendations for change. A
Request For Proposal from the North Dakota Department of Human Services
(DHS) was issued as a result of this authorization.
Myers and Stauffer LC submitted a proposal and was awarded the
contract in January 2002.
Consultant
Recommendations
90%
Occupancy Incentive
1) Myers and Stauffer recommends
North Dakota
retain a minimum occupancy program of 90%.
Rebasing Frequency
1) Based on our evaluation of the current payment system, our
recommendations would not change the following:
1) The flexibility to establish limit levels based on current
facility spending patterns and Medicaid budget limitations, 2) Efficiency
incentive on Indirect costs, 3) Operating margin on Direct and Other
Direct care costs categories or 4) Current method of basing efficiency
incentives and operating margins on the prior year per diems and limits.
2) We do recommend establishing a maximum number of years between
rebasing. We suggest that
rebasing occur no less frequently than every four years, with the
opportunity to rebase more frequently if spending patterns change
significantly. Annual
rebasing, while practiced in many states, subjects Medicaid programs to
less control in managing their systems.
3) Myers and Stauffer recommends a change from the percentile
method to the “median plus” method of calculating limits.
Equalized Rate Policy
1) Myers and Stauffer does not recommend any changes to the current
rate equalization policy of limiting private pay and other non-government
payers in semiprivate rooms to the comparable Medicaid rate.
2) We recommend that the Department consider adopting a limit on
charges for private pay residents in private rooms.
While we do not believe that
North Dakota
facilities have taken advantage of this current exception on any
wide-scale basis, a private room limit for private pay residents would be
a means of curtailing any future overpriced charges for private rooms.
We have seen no evidence to suggest that nursing facilities have
increased their private room rates excessively, we believe that this
differential would provide a reasonable basis to establish a private room
equalized rate cap.
3) We recommend a change to the current Medicaid property
calculation to encompass the growing proportion of private rooms to
semiprivate accommodations when reporting property costs.
Case Mix Payment System
1)
We recommend that the Department implement a permanently-funded MDS
accuracy audit program defined in administrative rule.
2) We recommend that the Department evaluate several changes when
the MDS 3.0 is implemented in the future.
Back
to the NDLTCA Issue Briefs 2003 Table of Contents
Home || About NDLTCA || Job Openings &
Announcements || Shopping
|| Mailings
|| Legislation
Calendar || Member Facilities
|| Sponsor & Associate Members || Resources || Conferences
Copyright © 2003 North Dakota Long Term Care
Association. All rights reserved.
Web site developed & maintained by Pamela
Thompson of North Dakota Long Term Care Association
July 31 2003 || www.ndltca.org/data/data04.html
|